272. "Steps to Justice."

BLOG STAT SHOWS VIEWS @ 17, 661 (?)

Although I came very close to deleting this much appreciated still FREE outlet, an early evening tel call from a representative of one of my more valued causes, the CBC - with their objective to have the CBC retain its mandate as an open-minded, properly funded National Broadcaster  - has given me second, if not third, thoughts.

"Why delete your blog, it's free isn't it?" was his opinion. That very thought took me on a mental voyage in which I ran the gamut of angles to 'Things that are 'FREE.'  Water was once 'FREE.' Now it's more expensive than oil. Matches were once 'FREE.' Some recycling centers are still 'FREE.'
But under the guise of WHAT? Many are now making big bucks selling their collected 'FREE' goods.

However, just because it's 'FREE' should one take advantage of it? I'm still amazed how I can SKYPE my family for 'FREE.' I still remember a Skype email: "Congratulations you are one of our first 1 million users!" Some 10 years ago?  Still, behind the 'FREE' must lie a need, a purpose! So I have decided, rather than put my issues with the Legal System to bed, and let others nibble away at it, I will start a new chapter.

Borrowing the above title: "Steps to Justice" from another group's efforts towards improving the legal system, I am using it to take me on a freshly inspired journey.

I recently met an SRL who actually WON his case in the appeal court of The Tax Court of Canada! I believe he was rewarded the $30,000 he was claiming.  On entering the court room there were some details about "most cases don't even get this far," as in most people would have long given up by now....

How when his turn to speak came, he intently looked up at the judge, and, never wavering from his factual rhetoric impressed the man to the point so convincingly, he likely felt his conscience could not let the claimant go empty-handed.  Raising his eyebrows at the Tax Defence Counsel, this judge did the right thing that day, and sided with fact and Justice.

The above example, together with the phrase 'Steps to Justice,' is where my next energies will go.  By presenting the Rules of Law as exercised by its oath-bound Officers, while juxtaposing its many resulting hypocritical realities, I hope to render, if anything, at least a potential towards possible reform.

"Steps to Justice" lie in the eye of the beholder. Each conscience determines to be either truthful, or not! Too many consciences are betrayed for the sake of greed and status quo.  When meaning is lost, chaos reigns, and the devil take the hindmost.

conscience |ˈkän(t)SHəns| nounan inner feeling or voice viewed as acting as a guide to the rightness or wrongness of one's behavior: 

status quo |ˌstādəs ˈkwō| noun (usu. the status quo) the existing state of affairs, especially regarding social or political issues:

271. Gradually loosing steam, with feelings of talking to myself....

VIEWS > STATED @ 17,641 (?)


This will be brief! I again tried to find Google Help to explain reasons as to the ins and outs of 'BOTS' versus REAL viewers.

My Stats show both viewers by Browser as well as by Equipment. These suggest, unless all are mechanical devices, that people from across the globe, with Canadians, then Americans at one and two, are taking note.

Still, with no one to actually share my thoughts with, all is becoming a rather lonely affair.

I wish Mr. PREZ Trump well. It should be a fascinating year.

Since I need not give Google my official notice....... I will let this sit and be for a while.    

270. 'WE' are soon 2B a Single Global Brain; then What?

VIEWS@17613

I recently asked for Google help to explain the validity of views and viewer identity to this Blog, or any posting for that matter.  I have yet to receive a telling, acceptable response. At the backend of this blog 'account', a Map shows Views from Russia, every few weeks. Are these facts, as I see them, correct? How do I trust these stats? Who are the 'viewers,' from Canada, the United Sates, a speck of Europe, and RUSSIA!.

Where are the mounting numbers come from? 17 thousand 600 +views? At 'ZERO' followers, are these mere mechanical 'bots' making-me-believe human individuals are actually reading my views?

With ZERO followers, WHO, or WHAT is adding to these numbers? Never a Tweet or response from a live one! Nothing like: 'Hey, good on ye Jan.... Keep up the diatribe.... We're in on it...Liking your rhetoric. Now we don't have to complain, you are doing it for us. We feel better already. Thumbs up!'

Like the Selfie, am I expressing myself on some black-hole vortex? Am I being subtly manipulated to think my time and input expression is in fact READ by INDIVIDUALS?

But instead, could it be a manipulation that has become the ultimate art of a greater online deception?

Are the likes of Google and Facebook to become, if not already so, the new bible of reality? Is the Tweet of a quacking monosyllabic Donald Trump to become the essence and reality of our new existence?

Is Mankind THAT MUCH IN A QUANDARY it now requires a questionable, unethical billionaire's business man president, to reign over the free world?

These are strange times for mankind indeed.

There is a NEW REALITY at play. Are we all cast - quasi Hollywood style -  as the STAR in our own SELFIE movie?

Are we, unbeknown to ourselves, merely masturbating, in an attempt to feel a sense of belonging?

269. A New Year > A New Beginning?

VIEWS@17,555

2017! A new beginning of what will very likely be an earth-shattering and telling year for our so-called 'Democracies.' (Bring it on Donald! Sew your business seed!)

Having spent some 6 years actively interrogating our legal system and discovering it to be seriously corrupt without any legal accountability, based on an Appeal Judge supplying me with plenty of rhetoric as to why I was not entitled to an Appeal of my last claim's dismissal in which I held the Ministry of Justice responsible for a Justice's biased erring on a Rule. The Honourable Madam Justice Garson additionally included an 1870 Civil Service ruling of Judicial immunity, inherited through the common law of England (Yes folks, we all continue to be British subjects). "...judges have all the powers, rights, incidents, privileges and immunities ... that on March 29, 1870, were vested in the Chief Justice and the other Justices of the Court."  

There you have written proof that when push comes to shove, ultimately the Courts are ABOVE the Rule of Law. No wonder the 'FREE' Western world is being taken on by the turmoiled East.

It proves that most Democracies are corrupt at their core. Our so-called legal systems, titled 'Justice' Ministries, hypocritically reign over us while fully un-accountable for their actions.

On the surface there is a pretense of objectivity and fairness, purportedly based on the assessment of presented proof of fact, as it relates to a promised association with the Rules of Law.

However, in practice, especially when functioning as a Self-Representing Litigant, instead, the hierarchic establishment feels seriously threatened, making short shrift of the ever increasing numbers of SRL invaders by readily dismissing them, extracting them from any further nibbling at their sacred, well-protected domain.

=====================================================

BELOW is a BC Greens email I received a while back: 

"1) It is the purpose of the Party to advance the Party's Platform, Positions, Policy, Values and Basis of Unity, and to contribute to the welfare of Canada, Canadians and the community of life in Canada by:

Be it resolved that in Article 5, all references to the term “Principles” be replaced with the term “Values” and,
that Clause 5.2 be deleted.

Removal of Member who has Intentionally Damaged the Party

BE IT RESOLVED that:

Bylaw 1.3 of the GPC Constitution: Resignation and Removal of Member be amended to add:

1.3.3 In accordance with 1.3.2 a member may be expelled, suspended, or otherwise disciplined for any conduct which (1) is contrary to the Members’ Code of Conduct, or (2) is contrary to this Constitution, or (3) is contrary to the principles and purpose of the Party, or (4) brings discredit to, or (5) intentionally damages the interests of the Party.

  

“I now lack confidence in Minister Polak to uphold the obligations outlined in her ministerial mandate letter. As such, I am calling for her to be replaced by a minister who will stand up for the people of B.C. and the water and environment that we all rely on.

As British Columbians who care about our communities, our only option has been to take matters into our own hands. It seems the only way to get the Ministry of Environment to do its job is by taking them to court.

Do you trust the government to look out for the safety of your community?

Andrew and I don’t, and we think something has to change at BC’s Ministry of Environment.

(Sonia Furstenau)

P.S. This is exactly why we don’t accept corporate donations at the BC Greens.When political parties owe their success to big money, they put corporations ahead of people."

 =============================================

 I say:

Our democracy is a living farce, rotten at its core! At the foundation of any political system functions its legal system. When it is dysfunctional (as I have now had a six year nightmare proving) NOTHING else falls in to place. Why should it? Everyone involved merely caters to the status quo, i.e. the 'Company Store.'  (If THEY can do it/ WE can do it)

If you, or we, want to make a scapegoat out of our Environment Minister (like Mr. Duffy, or Justice Camp)  NOTHING gets fixed! Our ROOT cause lies with our foundation (legal system) where, according to a Civil Rule created in 1870 in Ye Olde Engelande (yes we continue to all be Queen's subjects),  NO ONE IS ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANYTHING THEY DO IN THEIR DAILY DUTIES. .......Can you believe it? 

ERGO: If we really want 'change', THAT's where to start, in Ottawa, demanding/ insisting, on Major Reform in our so-called  'Justice' System. ....Until then, we are all living a LIE!