STATVIEWS@18,666
I continue to be baffled by our species. It is as if we all live under a big halo cloud, passively transfixed, while participating in a major 'Board Game.' Those who know the game best get to 'Rule' over 'Us.' Dictator killers, billionaire Tax evaders, posturing egomaniacs, sociopaths all. And we just let it be? I just don't get it!
Although we now and again speak of ongoing increased population, nobody seems to talk about enough is enough. Especially in the 'under'developed and most challenged East people continue to have 10 kids or more. When I see refugee camps, or citizens fleeing their devastated neighbourhoods while opposing religious groups are having a go at each other, most of what I see is hordes of little children.
I bet if we had only one/third of the present world population, there'd be a lot less fighting. Overcrowded, we are like the story of the lemmings, jumping over a cliff to their deaths to cut down their numbers.
How did we get here, and Why do we allow it? Because in History there were individuals with ego problems who were interested in self-aggrandizement,* the need to conquer others and 'rule' over them. The more sane and caring have no interest in this. Their egos do not need it.
I say, if it isn't already too late before some real shit starts flying, ... prepare yourselves...the cap is off the powder keg. World War lll......?
Why not get away from the 'ONE OF.'
One President! One Prime-Minister! One Dictator! One Queen! One God!.... One GURU?
Even most early and primitive man had many gods; a god of Thunder, a god of the Sea, a Fertility God, a Sun God etc. all to be respected, and not feared. http://www.fsmitha.com/
WHY not vote for Heads of Departments, like we have Ministers of Health, Finance, Agriculture, Social Affairs etc. Get RID of the Party system; let those who are knowledgeable in certain fields run for those offices, and let the public vote for the one they feel best suited for each of the positions, rather than allow the Prime Minister or President to pick his/her own cabinet.
Just some thoughts......
*the action or process of promoting oneself as being powerful or important.
Though still working on my major: gocascadia.com website, if Master Google allows me, I am reduced to leaving some of my personal rantings in this blog.
Monday, 17 April 2017
Saturday, 8 April 2017
280. 'VIRTUAL' - Our New World Order?
STAT VIEWS @ 18622
Well look-ye here... Mar-a-Lago Private Golf Club. Dining at its most posh. A weekend in Paradise on Earth. Just more circus act, I say; or is it straight Farce? The world's most prominent reigning twosome and their perfumed entourage meeting in the private gold lame clinic of Trump's opulence, while millions are starving in Africa, or getting killed by chemicals in Syria. How was your day?
Google stats show the last 'real' Cultural Revolution was in China in 1966. When Mao Zedong, leader of the Communist Party, fearing China would go the way of Russia, led his Peoples with his Communist Party's ideals in to his "Great Leap Forward" Cultural Revolution. That was then!
https://www.britannica.com/event/Cultural-Revolution
If V. Putin is indeed the spoiler force behind our North-American's latest fiasco scenario; if technology is now so sophisticated it is in charge of global affairs, able to determine outcome of drastic consequences, like pulling the One-Armed-Bandit slot machine, thinking your fate is undetermined you can actually win a million bucks, but in fact, the gadget is all computer-planned, knowing EXACTLY whether to 'give' or 'take'! Guess what? You won - Buddy!
So bring in the Clones? Or is it Clowns? "Don't worry..." goes the song: "They're already here."
'Virtual'*, not Trump, Putin, Xi, Trudeau, or even Angela Merkel, is running this world now. We must all bow down to Virtual now, for not HE, not SHE, but 'IT' is running our global affairs!
Roll over Beethoven!
*
almost or nearly as described, but not completely or according to strict definition: the virtual absence of bordercontrols.• Computing not physically existing as such but made by software to appear to do so: a virtual computer. See also virtual reality.• carried out, accessed, or stored by means of a computer, especially over a network: a virtual library | virtual learning.• Optics relating to the points at which rays would meet if produced backward.• Physics denoting particles or interactions with extremely short lifetimes and (owing to the uncertainty principle) indefinitely great energies, postulated as intermediates in some processes.
Well look-ye here... Mar-a-Lago Private Golf Club. Dining at its most posh. A weekend in Paradise on Earth. Just more circus act, I say; or is it straight Farce? The world's most prominent reigning twosome and their perfumed entourage meeting in the private gold lame clinic of Trump's opulence, while millions are starving in Africa, or getting killed by chemicals in Syria. How was your day?
Google stats show the last 'real' Cultural Revolution was in China in 1966. When Mao Zedong, leader of the Communist Party, fearing China would go the way of Russia, led his Peoples with his Communist Party's ideals in to his "Great Leap Forward" Cultural Revolution. That was then!
https://www.britannica.com/event/Cultural-Revolution
If V. Putin is indeed the spoiler force behind our North-American's latest fiasco scenario; if technology is now so sophisticated it is in charge of global affairs, able to determine outcome of drastic consequences, like pulling the One-Armed-Bandit slot machine, thinking your fate is undetermined you can actually win a million bucks, but in fact, the gadget is all computer-planned, knowing EXACTLY whether to 'give' or 'take'! Guess what? You won - Buddy!
So bring in the Clones? Or is it Clowns? "Don't worry..." goes the song: "They're already here."
'Virtual'*, not Trump, Putin, Xi, Trudeau, or even Angela Merkel, is running this world now. We must all bow down to Virtual now, for not HE, not SHE, but 'IT' is running our global affairs!
Roll over Beethoven!
*
almost or nearly as described, but not completely or according to strict definition: the virtual absence of bordercontrols.• Computing not physically existing as such but made by software to appear to do so: a virtual computer. See also virtual reality.• carried out, accessed, or stored by means of a computer, especially over a network: a virtual library | virtual learning.• Optics relating to the points at which rays would meet if produced backward.• Physics denoting particles or interactions with extremely short lifetimes and (owing to the uncertainty principle) indefinitely great energies, postulated as intermediates in some processes.
Sunday, 2 April 2017
279. Trying to make 'SENSE' of 'ANYTHING'
STAT-VIEWS@18,598
Leaving any 'conscience' out of it for the moment, let us turn hands-on 'practical' for a moment and look to see how Rules and 'Accountability' relate to various other areas in a purportedly organized society - I mean areas outside the haloed premises of a courthouse.
Certain behaviours, or the lack of them, could take you IN to a court environment, but would have to be initiated prior to be taken 'in to' that 'Just' Court scenario.
Most simply, let's find ourselves driving a vehicle on a highway approaching a traffic light. We know that GREEN means 'GO' - no problem. Alert, assessing the complete circumstances, we merrily go through the lights, and proceed. "Have a good day, eh?"
But 'WHOOPS,' as we near the intersection, the lights suddenly change to ORANGE!
Being a seasoned driver, we 'KNOW' this means that imminently the ORANGE will change to bright RED; that we literally have been given nano-seconds to decide whether to slow down to a STOP (in front of the white line on the road with the changing traffic lights in clear view ahead of us) or -----boot it, and beat the RED!
Guess what? With absolutely no traffic anywhere in sight (remember, we are on the open highway), we BOOT it - with the lights turning RED, we notice, just as we reach the 'In the Clear' of the opposite side. "Woosh" ...... we did it! ..... So we think ...
However! We have thought too quickly, because a man in a well-known UNIFORM, some several hundred yards ahead of us, has stepped from behind a bunch of highway growth, and beckons us to pull over!
Long story short, with NO argument and reasonings acceptable:
"You drove through a RED light; here's your $200. traffic ticket! Pay it, or see you in Court! Have a nice day- eh! " ........
Stunned, we drive on.
You show up in Court; you argue your point; no pictures or factual proof of evidence of any particulars can be shown. It's your word against the 'Officer of the Law.' Your conscience is clear! Had you stopped, as the lights turned RED, you would have come to a skidding halt, driving fast, but well below the allowable 110 KM speed limits of this highway.
Yet, you are held 'ACCOUNTABLE!' It's your word against the Officer's! And you are found "Guilty as charged!" And fined the $200.00 + of course the time and costs it took you to bother to show up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUT TO AN 'IN-CHAMBERS' SUPREME COURT SESSION! Please understand, this is NOT your every day, overflowing-making-money-for-the-gov type of session; this is the Province's SUPREME COURT in which the SRL claimant has 'bothered' to challenge this 'Ministry of Justice' to explain the order judgment on a provable Rule MISTAKE made by one of its highest ranking officers, a fellow Judge! Since the Judge is UN-accountable in their daily services, WHO IS? Where does the RED light come in here? Surely SOME-one must be held responsible?!
In Attendance:
A Supreme Court Judge (On the Provincial Ministry's payroll @ circa $300,000 annually) ; the Ministry's representing Defence Counsel (Also on the Ministry's payroll @ circa $100,000 (?) annually); and little old me @ $17,000 basic old-age pension)
Without even looking to discuss the details, all based on FACTS and RULES I presented, the answer is:
Def Counsel: "Just because the Judge erred in her dismissal of her claim does not mean he is entitled to any compensation!"
Judge: "You mean, allegedly erred!"
Even though in, what I 'thought' I was attending was a Summary Trial, in which there is no need for any explicit, additional dialogue, since all has been presented in WRITTEN form, I am asked at the outset of the session:
Court: "I have read your materials.....so what is it you would like me to do for you today, Sir"
Although all of that as well, is clearly down on BLACK AND WHITE, written by this claimant, there is NEVER any referral to ANY of the WRITTEN text. Instead we get:
Discussed between 2 Men, both in their Official capacities, both in the employment of a single and same Ministry of 'Justice,' a claim which is now Justly considered an 'abuse of the court process.'
Result being: I am readily DISMISSED!
More than somewhat baffled, so that I might actually understand this process, I ask for, and am promised to receive, a specific and detailed WRITTEN REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - ordered by the judge to be written by same Defence Counsel and shown same Judge, prior to being supplied to myelf.
Selfsame WRITTEN REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ARE NEVER SENT ME!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing above 2 scenarios:
Can the reader make any 'SENSE' of 'ANYTHING?'
Any even subliminal NEVER ENDING FLASHING RED LIGHTS DRIVING YOU INSANE YET?
GO FIGURE! ...........
Well, the system is called Democracy! Collusion is in full Bloom in the Justice Department!
"WHOA Canada, our Chrome and Naive Land....."
Keep counting sheep before you go to sleep at night; but have a nice day - EH!
Leaving any 'conscience' out of it for the moment, let us turn hands-on 'practical' for a moment and look to see how Rules and 'Accountability' relate to various other areas in a purportedly organized society - I mean areas outside the haloed premises of a courthouse.
Certain behaviours, or the lack of them, could take you IN to a court environment, but would have to be initiated prior to be taken 'in to' that 'Just' Court scenario.
Most simply, let's find ourselves driving a vehicle on a highway approaching a traffic light. We know that GREEN means 'GO' - no problem. Alert, assessing the complete circumstances, we merrily go through the lights, and proceed. "Have a good day, eh?"
But 'WHOOPS,' as we near the intersection, the lights suddenly change to ORANGE!
Being a seasoned driver, we 'KNOW' this means that imminently the ORANGE will change to bright RED; that we literally have been given nano-seconds to decide whether to slow down to a STOP (in front of the white line on the road with the changing traffic lights in clear view ahead of us) or -----boot it, and beat the RED!
Guess what? With absolutely no traffic anywhere in sight (remember, we are on the open highway), we BOOT it - with the lights turning RED, we notice, just as we reach the 'In the Clear' of the opposite side. "Woosh" ...... we did it! ..... So we think ...
However! We have thought too quickly, because a man in a well-known UNIFORM, some several hundred yards ahead of us, has stepped from behind a bunch of highway growth, and beckons us to pull over!
Long story short, with NO argument and reasonings acceptable:
"You drove through a RED light; here's your $200. traffic ticket! Pay it, or see you in Court! Have a nice day- eh! " ........
Stunned, we drive on.
You show up in Court; you argue your point; no pictures or factual proof of evidence of any particulars can be shown. It's your word against the 'Officer of the Law.' Your conscience is clear! Had you stopped, as the lights turned RED, you would have come to a skidding halt, driving fast, but well below the allowable 110 KM speed limits of this highway.
Yet, you are held 'ACCOUNTABLE!' It's your word against the Officer's! And you are found "Guilty as charged!" And fined the $200.00 + of course the time and costs it took you to bother to show up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUT TO AN 'IN-CHAMBERS' SUPREME COURT SESSION! Please understand, this is NOT your every day, overflowing-making-money-for-the-gov type of session; this is the Province's SUPREME COURT in which the SRL claimant has 'bothered' to challenge this 'Ministry of Justice' to explain the order judgment on a provable Rule MISTAKE made by one of its highest ranking officers, a fellow Judge! Since the Judge is UN-accountable in their daily services, WHO IS? Where does the RED light come in here? Surely SOME-one must be held responsible?!
In Attendance:
A Supreme Court Judge (On the Provincial Ministry's payroll @ circa $300,000 annually) ; the Ministry's representing Defence Counsel (Also on the Ministry's payroll @ circa $100,000 (?) annually); and little old me @ $17,000 basic old-age pension)
Without even looking to discuss the details, all based on FACTS and RULES I presented, the answer is:
Def Counsel: "Just because the Judge erred in her dismissal of her claim does not mean he is entitled to any compensation!"
Judge: "You mean, allegedly erred!"
Even though in, what I 'thought' I was attending was a Summary Trial, in which there is no need for any explicit, additional dialogue, since all has been presented in WRITTEN form, I am asked at the outset of the session:
Court: "I have read your materials.....so what is it you would like me to do for you today, Sir"
Although all of that as well, is clearly down on BLACK AND WHITE, written by this claimant, there is NEVER any referral to ANY of the WRITTEN text. Instead we get:
Discussed between 2 Men, both in their Official capacities, both in the employment of a single and same Ministry of 'Justice,' a claim which is now Justly considered an 'abuse of the court process.'
Result being: I am readily DISMISSED!
More than somewhat baffled, so that I might actually understand this process, I ask for, and am promised to receive, a specific and detailed WRITTEN REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - ordered by the judge to be written by same Defence Counsel and shown same Judge, prior to being supplied to myelf.
Selfsame WRITTEN REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ARE NEVER SENT ME!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing above 2 scenarios:
Can the reader make any 'SENSE' of 'ANYTHING?'
Any even subliminal NEVER ENDING FLASHING RED LIGHTS DRIVING YOU INSANE YET?
GO FIGURE! ...........
Well, the system is called Democracy! Collusion is in full Bloom in the Justice Department!
"WHOA Canada, our Chrome and Naive Land....."
Keep counting sheep before you go to sleep at night; but have a nice day - EH!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)