On being in a SUPREME court as an SRL in a well-established Democracy..... (several years ago)
When cunning DEMOCRATICALLY TRAINED, LEGALLY positioned manipulators, representing a purportedly 'JUST' society, grabbed my attention and spat me out like so much fodder!.....
Below is quoted text (with my inserts) from an article written by a British Columbia, Canada, young Defence Counsel, who sat in a Supreme Court session representing the Ministry of 'Justice,' with myself as SRL, and a Supreme Court Judge overseeing my CLAIM, employed by the self-same institution.
I was holding the Province responsible for one of their Provincial Judges earlier erroneous dismissals, of a perfectly legitimate Claim I had filed, based on using the Province's allowable secondary 'OR' Rule of filing a Claim against an extra provincial party.
This Ministry of Justice's employee and representative (Defence Council) in an earlier article had written the following:
"I believe that, for the most part, the law emanates from the life that we give to it. Sometimes, however, I also believe that the law breathes with a life of its own in order to serve a purpose higher than what we may be prepared for. In these cases, there is always a tension between what the law is trying to tell us and how we interpret this message to suit our purposes in the moment. "
Picking out the following sentence: "the law breathes with a life of its own in order to serve a purpose higher than what we may be prepared for."
OH YES, I agreed: the law DEFINITELY breathes with a life of its own!
"in order to serve a purpose higher than what we may be prepared for."
Here, this lawyer, and Ministry of Justice Defence Counsel's employee, as a learned legal entity, segues into his own legally tainted nomans-land. With his usage of the words 'purpose higher'...
Our Democratic Courts have indeed been cunningly designed! Like impressive Theatres, Judges are positioned at the high triangle, looking down on us plebeians they are about to shred; and when required - in black Robes. The purpose 'higher' is played out like a second to GOD scenario.
....the defence council's wrap up phrase: "than what we may be prepared for."
With his added: "there is always a tension between what the law is trying to tell us and how we interpret this message to suit our purposes in the moment."
What the "law is trying to tell us," is that it, ITSELF, is up for interpretation. The law, as expressed by those who implement it, is, in fact there to "SUIT OUR PURPOSES IN THE MOMENT."
The Court has cleverly determined legalese, construed in ENGLISH verbiage, it tends to leave the general public baffled by its actual meaning! Still, this is what is taught the Law student. You may not understand it NOW, but THIS IS the rhetoric of 'LEGAL SPEAK' IN COURT! ... It is, in truth, TWISTED DOUBLE SPEAK!
I.E: 'WE', those employed in this purported 'Democracy,' ARE HERE TO BAFFLE you, the claimant CLIENT, with our learned legal rhetoric! WE ARE ULTIMATELY SUPERIOR, SINCE WE KNOW the LAW! THAT"S what WE, or our government, paid for, to be taught to do! This, in every legitimate way, got us our diplomas from University!
Hallelujah this Demo has surely gone CRAZY! Democracy is a fallacy!
I apologize for this reaching back at lunacy.... Maybe our recent Canadian voting forced me to look back..... who knows....
BOOHOO to all its REALITY silliness .....
PS: additional apologies for the awkward visuals, showing my own text, as if it were the Defence Council's ...... Such are the idiosyncratic software allowances. There is no perfection (unless of-course it's my own failings! ....Go figure...
PS: The looks of this page is NOT WHAT UPLOADS. ... Free, but wanting software I guess....
