Friday, 7 August 2015

202. "proud to be Canadian (?)"

VIEWS@13587

The following article from the Canadian Lawyer's Magazine came in to my email inbox this morning. I thought I would share it with you (my unknown, enigmatic readers) by adding the following comment:

Reality lies within the eye of the beholder. One's truth can be the other's puzzlement. So it will be always; a potted plant, a family member cremated. To one an obscure entity; to the other, the most trustworthy friend, or loved one. So our combined realities of life unfold...

Reflecting briefly on the below, expressions as such are telling, since it represents the objectives of an established defined group. It is their destined truth and recognized reality. Should, though, upon its fathoming, you find yourself at an opposing stance, when your realities have tumbled down to reconfigure a complete opposite response, the Yin and Yang of both consciences battle for acceptance. Regardless, all is what it is > REAL!

So each of us are left to determine our inner selves. Be who you must, or bend to accept allowances. Ultimate truth is fickle, seemingly always reinterpreting! Or is it? Some of us just can't budge.

Personally I thought 'cute', the following quote:
"Rocco Galati, who is intent on making the government actually follow the law"
Like Donald Trump: "Not all Mexicans are rapists etc.." I understand he is ahead in the polls...:(>

My take is that clearly some conscientious lawyers have grave concerns with what they have subscribed to participate in. Having been brought up by law-abiding parents, deciding to make a difference, they discover they are over-dosing on naivety.
Duh! You have entered a business, not a regulative, meaningful, democratic cause!

Still, with its ups and downs, suffering our egregious effects, the world continues to unfold, as it has for millennia. And, as a species, we will either get our act together and discover that by learning to adapt and adopt Nature's equilibrium, indicating we deserve to continue to participate in the most awe-inspiring live-act of being - This WORLD has Talent! Or, deservedly, we will self-destruct.

The final proof is in our pudding!
==================================================================

The Top 25 Most Influential
Item extra fields
         Cover Story

Item Author
Written by  Gail J. Cohen
Date created
Posted Date: August 3, 2015
Plugins: AfterDisplayTitle K2 Plugins: K2AfterDisplayTitle
         Print Button Print Email Button Email Anchor link to comments below - if enabled K2 Plugins: K2CommentsCounter Add new comment

Plugins: BeforeDisplayContent K2 Plugins: K2BeforeDisplayContent Item introtext
JoomlaWorks "UberPageBreak" Plugin (v1.0) starts here
Table of contents
         The Top 25 Most Influential
         Changemakers
         Criminal/Human Rights Law
         The World Stage
         Corporate-Commercial
Text starts here
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 80
Canadian Lawyer’s Top 25 Most Influential in the justice system and legal profession in Canada is now in its sixth year. Every year, the Top 25 is the magazine’s most-read, and most commented-on, feature. And once again, the number of nominations as well as votes in our public poll show how engaged our readers are in supporting and highlighting their colleagues who are doing extraordinary things both within the profession as well as beyond it.
Item fulltext

As in previous years, we put out a public call for nominations to legal groups and associations representing a variety of memberships and locations; last year’s Top 25 honourees; our readership; and our internal panel of writers and editors.

We received an incredible 135 nominations, which the internal panel whittled down to the 120 candidates who met our criteria. We then posted that list online and polled our readers for their votes — and you let us know in droves what you thought. The number of voters increased by a third over last year, with 9,105 people participating and commenting on those who they thought made their mark over the past 18 months. The final list of 25 is based on that poll with input and the last word from the Canadian Lawyer editorial panel.

Being named one of Canadian Lawyer’s Top 25 Most Influential is not just about those who’ve steered the biggest deals or made the most splash on the news pages — although those are a part of it. Closing a big deal, for instance, may not have a substantial impact beyond that particular business or industry. We aim to select lawyers who have been influential within the profession as well as society over the last year and a half — both at home and beyond Canada’s borders. Inclusion in the Top 25 talks to a level of respect, the ability to influence public opinion, and to help shape the laws of this country and others; contribution to the strength and quality of legal services; involvement and impact within the justice community; and social and political influence and involvement.

The Top 25 is split into five areas of influence with five winners in each of the following categories: government, associations, and non-profits — including courts, public inquiries, and officers of Parliament; changemakers; criminal and human rights law; the world stage; and corporate-commercial law. Nominees were put in the category in which the individual exercised their influence during the time period.

A number of previous honourees are back this year: perennial winner Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin; perpetual rabble rouser Rocco Galati, who is intent on making the government actually follow the law; and Louise Arbour, Murray Klippenstein, and Pascal Paradis all in the world stage category.

For the first time, we have included a write-in candidate. Justice Murray Sinclair, who made the list last year for his contributions as the chairman of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, wasn’t on our list of nominees but with the release of the TRC’s recommendations and executive summary of its hearings, Sinclair’s impact and influence on Canadian society deserved mention.

There are also some great new additions to the list this year including Omar Khadr’s lawyers Dennis Edney and Nathan Whitling, who are only the second duo to win the honour for their combined accomplishment. Marie Henein, who has had some of the most noteworthy clients this past year including former CBC radio host Jian Ghomeshi, has a very high profile. The changemakers category boasts a slew of new names including fertility law expert Sara Cohen, Crown attorney Allison Dellandrea, law firm re-engineer Mark Tamminga, and Calgary law professor Alice Woolley — all of whom have been instrumental in making change across a wide range of areas.

This year’s top vote getter was Louise Arbour, who has knocked off McLachlin, who has held that title for most of the Top 25’s six-year run. For the first time in her storied career, Arbour joined a law firm last year becoming counsel in residence at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Montreal, where she’s providing strategic counsel as part of the firm’s litigation practice. Voters in the online poll variously described Arbour as “Canada’s legal star abroad,” and an “international superstar.” That sentiment is likely why she was awarded with her own star on Canada’s Walk of Fame recently. One voter went so far as to say Arbour made them “proud to be Canadian.”

While only 25 of the impressive nominees made the final list, every single one of them made a distinct impact and their accomplishments are many, and varied — not to mention what many of them have done behind the scenes or on a pro bono or volunteer basis. It’s these lawyers and judges from across Canada and many different areas of practice who uphold the greatest ideals of the profession and are worthy of recognition.

In the following pages, we present the Top 25 Most Influential for 2015. They are listed with the top vote getter in each category first, followed by the others in alphabetical order.

Want to add your own kudos? Disagree with the choices? Did we miss someone obvious? Post comments below or e-mail to cl.editor@thomsonreuters.com. We’ll be doing it all again next year.

Text ends here


Saturday, 1 August 2015

201. 'DUE PROCESS' - What is it?

VIEWS@13493


due process(also due process of law) 
nounfair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement. 
"Every Canadian should be allowed Due Process" so the newly appointed top military General expressed during an interview. He would also put an end to gender bashing. Well, he didn't quite put it like that, but he indicated in-equality of the sexes had no place in his troops! Under his watch it would be eliminated!

I guess regardless any biological urges, inherent or expressed otherwise... he would NOT tolerate it!
I'm looking forward to seeing his changes in upsetting the Status Quo in that system.

How about what we're doing? Having a serious look at the 'legal' system.
------------------------------------------------>

It's all a bit like Alice in Wonderland, Due Process I mean. 'Due Process' through whose eyes? 
When you think stuff is making sense, somehow it is proven otherwise.
In fact I have come to the conclusion to beware anyone who seems to be making sense! 
What is down in black on white is to be questioned! Who wrote the Rules anyway?

When you're told that Judges are the creme de la creme of our society, just think of them, sitting there, all alone, as elevated pinnacles of our society - in their robes - looking down on us plebeians, looking up at them? How boring it must get, always looking down on people!

No wonder they veer off, guided by their foot-soldier 'brothers,' with their arguments at the ready! Alice in Wonderland indeed. It would be funny, good theatre, if it weren't nibling at the very essence of our democratic society. Our Courts' realities are NOT based on relevance and FACT, as the Rules prescribe. It is based on ARGUMENT, and a card baring member's persuasion!  
Who is doing the clogging of the Courts here?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
Comparatively 'empty' of humans, Canada I mean, we are not concerned about lack of physical space - yet.  Regardless our multi-cultured inhabitants, we are still a generally 'polite' and well-behaving Nation. Unlike many over populated places, we are mostly always "Sorry." Why? About what? 

While our species is beginning to run amuck, imploding as I see it, not yet fully aware of its ultimate consequences, I have discussed feudalism and the control of few over many; how little has changed.

Here's a link to a wonderful read sent me by someone I am of late communicating with:  
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/rodell/woe_unto_you_lawyers.htm

Think of it? A handful of plebeians meddling with a well-oiled cartel! In order to succeed, we must be gentle, yet persuasive. These are men and women with ego, pomp and posture who jab and stab for a living; not nurture, like philosophers, necessarily wise with empathy, consideration and ethics.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with the concept of 'Due Process.'  It's the putting it to practice where the rubs lie hiding.
- fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement. 
'Fair treatment' ...  'through the normal judicial system' would you please explain that your honour? Did I get 'Fair' Treatment? Am I dealing with the 'normal' judicial system here?
Court: Under the circumstances Mr. Steen you shall answer the questions! (do as your told, or else)Steen: Would you please explain to me what the 'circumstances' are that make the to me irrelevant questions, > 'RELEVANT!' ???Court:  The Court is not here to explain itself Mr. Steen. (i.e. we're sick and tired of your shenanigans > see ye)
ERGO, 'Due Process' >  "especially as a citizen's entitlement" all depends on:-  who is doing the processing.....  









Wednesday, 15 July 2015

200. Battling the Malaise of Dishonesty

VIEWS@13356

Another milestone date, July 11, has come and gone. Seven years now since the contracted 'Completion Date' of our Classifieds by Postal Code Website did not get to potentially shine online as per specified. The maybe possible was not to be. Still, the sun rises and the sun sets; so the lay folk believe. Whether in view or not, it continues to be an unquestionable fact - the ultimate truth. No sun no life.

One of the luxuries allowed elders, yip > ME! is that we have far fewer deadlines. Having done our bit, the 'RUSH' is out of life; unless of course DEATH comes knocking, unexpectedly; a final interruption determining the final deadline.

So I'm taking my sweet time completing and filing my 'Application,' challenging the Provincial Minister of Justice + Attorney General. I can only take so much energy each morning delving through folders, looking for a file that states a pertinent something to be presented as proof or query.

As such I have a running Word doc, entitled 'practice AFFIDAVIT' that sits on my desktop. Each morning over my 2 cups of organic I scan its text and mull over whether it stays, is rewritten, or chucked.

In itself this is an interesting process; at least to me. Different morning, different mood. One thing for sure, it's getting shorter all the time, and the timbre is changing. Starting with 'feelings,' as if I'm communicating with like-minded 'other' humans, I tried to be inclusive by embracing the qualities of 'good' and 'conscience.' Gradually now, I am keeping 'me' out of it, writing in the third person. Striving towards the cold and impersonal, sticking to hard facts. Claimant did this on THIS date; that occurred on THAT date! From that perspective there is a gradual improvement

Destined to retain the naive qualities one associates with youth and in-experience, it appears I may never embody the qualities previously considered in-human. Dishonesty through nefarious manipulation is the accepted standard now. "Call now, supplies are limited." "This is a one-time offer only!" "You'll get up to $5000 off, if you call NOW!""Our product Kills 99.9 % of all vermin!"

Bating us with nonsense rhetoric of word bites, they tantalize to manipulate our gullible falsehoods. I keep telling myself to stick to the cold facts! But I keep wondering: Can anyone be cornered to confess? Who from within a system will admit they are responsible? Do facts still have meaning? Or is it all just so much 'PAP' to control the masses? When is anything considered a crime?

As likely my last stand, time will tell.



Friday, 3 July 2015

199. The Realities of a Police State

VIEWS@ 13275

The following is a cut/paste article from the bc-freedom.com website
It discusses the ins and outs of those of us who decided to retain our analogue meters.
What needs to be kept in mind here is that our basic utility providers are essentially forcing us to comply with whatever they have decided it is we need, like it or not.
==============================================================

"You will see on the 'Notice' from BC Hydro a key element.
It says 'Contact' as in 'You must contact BC Hydro at 1-800-409-8199' As we are sure you are used to by now, this is yet another trick for them to make you think you MUST call them, but that is not the case it says clearly CONTACT and thus you can do so by mail. There is no need or reason to call them. DO NOT CALL THEM. If you are seeing other groups, letters, etc. saying to CALL them... do not.
You will also see they keep repeating "It is our equipment" in more or less words, and, if you have done a claim to which they have not disputed, it is not, so here you can see they are trying to make it so you think (despite all you have done) that it is their meter... which it is not.
There are some out there that may be saying 'they are only wanting to switch an analogue meter with an analogue meter... what's the big deal, this is a victory for us, let's take it and run' FALSE.
Their objective is to take OWNERSHIP of your meter which you have a Claim to. They want to end that claim. This is just tricks to get you to let your guard down, don't fall for it.
Just think for 2 seconds, why on earth would they go through all the trouble to put on what is likely an older meter (likely taken from Fortis BC area) given a shine and prepped for you, when, you could simply just keep your meter that you have now? It is obvious something is up.
If you take the 'Legacy' Meter, not only will you lose ownership, but you will be giving your consent to enroll in the 'Meter Choices Program' 
This is easily understood by the language of the document itself as well as the fact that out in the field, they are not taking 'new analogue' meters to peoples houses. They are using multi-decade old meters to replace the 'expired' meters (many of which are decades newer than the replacement) so this is not about an 'exchange' but something much bigger. How does a blue, red, yellow... whatever tag on a meter make the mechanics Inside the meter any different? It doesn't. It is all just desperate tricks, which was the whole point of the 'meter expiry' as they keep going on and on with new 'tricks' (offers to contract) Clean Energy Act, Meter Choices Program, Meter Expiry and so on (with many notices and offers in between).
This is their trick to not only take a meter they have registered into the Meter Choices Program (MCP) which puts you in that program but to also get you to take a new meter NUMBER, which changes your account, your contract and is most likely their way of trying to nullify all your previous hard work and document sending to get you into a new contract.
Please don't fall for what other groups are saying that this is ok, just a simple swap out, just getting an analogue meter, we are extremely puzzled as to why this is being deemed ok or good advice from people. If it was analogue for analogue or electromechanical for electromechanical then... maybe... but still a bad idea. But they use "LEGACY METER" and have been for some time now, so you "ACCEPT" a "LEGACY" meter and you are in the MCP! Perhaps those saying this is a good idea didn't even read the notice? Or perhaps cannot understand what is in play? Who knows...
We have made a very simple document for you to send off back to the Address at the bottom of the page that BC Hydro sent you. And if it is 1, 2, 3 notices... that's ok too.
For now, you must rebut (see contact above) or BC Hydro will assume you agree to the terms of either losing ownership of your current meter (see ending your claim of right) or agreeing that they can cut your power. This is NOT a disconnection 'notice' this is a notice for you to 'CONTACT' them.
Understand as well, once you are in the MCP, they literally can (and likely will) come back in a year maybe less and say 'this meter is also expired but now we have no 'old' new meters and you will have to take a smart meter since you decided to accept the terms of the MCP'
Which again is why we cannot understand why people are saying 'let them swap the meter for a new analogue' when of course we know this is NOT a new 'analogue' but is clearly stated, by BC Hydro, in the notice sent that this will be called a LEGACY METER. In the 'physical' world, yes, they are the same thing but in the game that BC Hydro is trying to play it is a totally separate entity altogether.
HOW TO RETURN ORIGINAL BC HYDRO (BCH) LETTER AND INCLUDE WITH IT THIS REBUTTAL NOTICE TO BCH"

==================================================================

Blogger Note:
Why is it that the common man has so much difficulty in being heard? 
Because NOTHING has changed for hundreds of years! Democracy is not only a fallacy,
those who believe it to be real and functioning are either high on carbon monoxide, or full of make-believe, which may be the easiest mindset of denial. 
I say "Wake Up and smell the Coffee, it is de-caffeinated!"