69. IS EVERYTHING RIGGED?

VIEWS @ 5514

With grave concern I watched the 'Michael Morton Case' on television last night. Accused of the murder of his wife, in front of his young son, he was wrongfully jailed for some 25 years, until the case was reopened by caring lawyers, and DNA on a kerchief determined someone else committed the murder. Recently discovered transcript from at the time, whereby the young son had stated his dad was not there, had been held back as evidence.

There are frightening amounts of highly disturbing anomalies running rampant through our purported system of fairness, justice, and 'Due Process.' My efforts here to get to the bottom of the irregularities I am encountering pale in comparison to the Michael Morton horrors. The show stated: "If the law is not followed there should be consequences!"

Those "consequences" took some 25 years out of an innocent man's life who had lost a wife he loved, a son who turned on his 'criminal' father and was gravely effected, and an ultimate fluke of some law-abiding, caring, professionals so concerned they helped him pro bono.  

Why are so few of us willing to stand up and demand justice as is prescribed by law!? It must be because most have given up; given up on believing mankind is essentially good. Steadily growing inwards, we are living in an age of fear now, accepting what befalls us, carrying on the best we can.

I am beginning to sense a certain evil at the helm. Catch as catch can, the devil takes the hindmost. By doing NOTHING, we are feeding the beast! That's why Everything is Rigged! 

NOTE:
I continue to await delivery of the 2 transcripts I have ordered.
I am expecting a verification notice that a $200 money order I sent as down-payment to a transcribers' home address (delivered by Registered mail yesterday) has in fact been received.
(So that the transcriber may commence with the transcription of the ordered session. This one being the September 20, 2013, final 'Special Appointment' with the Senior Master. The Master who ultimately dismissed the claim, based on my unwillingness to continue answering the to me irrelevant questions.
i.e. questions having absolutely no relevancy to the contractually based claim. Questions the former Master had indicated as: "All questions are relevant in the circumstances and shall be answered!"
The claimant, asking for an explanation of the sentence was informed: "The court is not there to explain itself."