97. "DUTY OF THE COURT."

The following received May 7, 2014 from a self representing litigant.
Views@7,640

_________________________________________________________________________________

"Dear Mr. Steen, 

I am given to understand that you have, or are in the process of starting, a blog expressing concerns with respect to how justice is currently being administered in Canada.  In this regard, I respectfully place the following matter before you as I have done with the Law Society, and am now preparing to do in the courts of this province." 
______________________________________________________________________

Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

______________________________________________________________________

 Dear Premier Clark,

I am writing you, as well as the Attorney General, and leader of the opposition, because I believe the enclosed stands as a testament to the failed social policy of processing our children and families through such an adversarial system as we have existent still today.  Given it will affect half of all Canadians over the course of their lives, I feel this worthwhile to bring into the public eye.  
______________________________________________________________________

DUTY OF THE COURT

• It is the duty of the court to satisfy itself that there has been no collusion in relation to the application for a divorce and to dismiss the application if it finds that there was collusion presenting it. 
• To ensure itself that reasonable arrangements have been made for the support of any children of the marriage.  
• To ensure itself that there has been no connivance on the part of the spouse bringing the procedure and to dismiss the application if that spouse has condoned or connived at the act of conduct complained of.     

______________________________________________________________________

I realize the Courts and Law Society must diligently strive to protect their members from undue harm that might arise from false allegations, and rightly so.  However, should it be determined this complaint is well founded, I have requested that the same degree of due diligence now be applied to protect the public.

I believe the enclosed stands as a testament to the failed social policy of processing our children and families through such an adversarial system as exists today. Given it will affect half of all Canadians over the course of their lives, I feel this worthwhile to bring into the public eye.   

I close by reminding all that none of this is about me as a person, a parent, or about divorce for that matter. It is solely about asking the courts and the Law Society if what it finds in these records meets its own ethics and practice standards. I await the answer to this question. 
  
Respectfully,
Hal Jeffery 

_______________________________________________________________________

This material has been presented to numerous organizations and
people concerned with the welfare of children and civil liberties.

A STUDY IN DUE PROCESS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xb1PmzQm24&feature=youtu.be

A STUDY IN DUE PROCESS PART 2A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR4VMfMreSA&feature=youtu.be