109. The Rule of Law - A most elusive Concept!

VIEWS@8236

The above header is part of a legal firms opening statement. My experience continues to confirm that 
NOTHING makes sense, and ALL is a crap-shoot. 

Below 10) + 11) are from Post 104. At this stage, the chances of being appointed a scrupulous judge with her/his own conscientious agenda are extremely slim. Too much lies at stake here. To acknowledge that Rules and Procedure were not adhered to, would hurt those who were in charge. Easier to let me go, on a technicality, then wag a back-room finger if still required.  

"10) That BASED ON THE RELEVANT FACTS - UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES - the Self-Representing Litigant from British Columbia was neither treated to proportionality, fairness, or the strict adherence of the Rules. In addition to the number of legal discrepancies overlooked, DUE PROCESS did NOT take place."

Below 11). Although it would show indeed some hope - that not all is 'effected'  - it would seem too much to ask for "in the circumstances," especially in a case with a Self-Representing Litigant.

"11) As such, the Judge, in her/his wisdom and integrity, unswayed by any potential urge to give in to any possible Jurisdictionally favorable slanting, or 'semblance of relevance' - under the circumstances -  by taking ALL FACTORS IN TO CONSIDERATION, while upholding the very essence of their office as Pillars of our society - in the "CIRCUMSTANCES"- acknowledges sufficient questionable discrepancies occurred and were committed."

Next Post will begin with 'The Set Up' of the Masters.