215. Application Adjourned!

VIEWS@14525

Life is wonderfully weird.
Perhaps I ought to apologize to my anonymous viewers.

Several weeks ago I met a seriously experienced SRL on line (he had read my Blog and contacted me) stating that as another "UN-represented"(he called it) Litigant he had many years practice, having won most of his cases. He informed me I had a 'weak' case. My 'Cause of Action' would not fly. He offered to help, but I would have to adjourn, since we needed TIME to do our research.

Sufficiently impressed, I did as he suggested, and, filing another REQUISITION I managed to postpone the Trial. It is now set for February 12, 2016.

Apparently what seemed like a slam-dunk to me is naive thinking. The obvious is far from pertinent and applicable - so it appears. Just because I feel to have proof the BC Judge erred 'twice,' and inadvertently sent me on a 5 year nightmare in Ottawa, doesn't mean I am entitled to recompense!

Judges are human beings too :(> After all they can't help being affected by choice-driven rules...
"Will you be coming to Ottawa to ARGUE your case in person, Mr. Steen?"(Defense Counsel)

==================================================================

Definition: 

argue |ˈärgyo͞o| verb (argues, arguing, argued) 1 [ reporting verb ] give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view: [ with clause ] :  defense attorneys argue that the police lacked “probable cause” to arrest the driver | [ with direct speech ] :  “It stands to reason,” she argued.• [ with obj. ] (argue someone into/out of) persuade someone to do or not to do (something) by giving reasons: I tried to argue him out of it.=========================================================================="Typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view"Surely Self Representing Litigants, or rather 'UN-represented' Litigants, shall NOT be allowed to have a say in the matter, regardless how solid their argument. What would it do to the professional system?" I should inform you that the provincial government does not provide compensation to parties to litigation because they are dissatisfied with a judicial decision." (reply from the Office of the Minister of Justice on trying to establish dialogue with opposing/ defense Counsel) So, at the foundation of our laws, there lies - application, reliant on each judge's decision of the day, like a 'Soup-du-Jour', based on who's 'argument' she/he will be swayed to pick at that instance; applicably correct, just, or not; Thank you > NEXT!  Beware the SRL who thinks it could go their way! Since 'arguments' are subjective, the pendulum can be manipulated to sway the 'chosen' way.  This is called JUSTICE! Apparently then, now, the objective is to find precedent. Since the Minister of Justice's Department is responsible for protecting the public's Interest, let's go looking. Below quotes from BC Government 's Online Info: (assuming 'non-Criminal' Offences would be awarded similar consideration)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ministry of Justice

The Vision - Courageous, Fair and Efficient – a Prosecution Service that has the confidence of the public

"As an integral part of the Ministry of Justice, the Criminal Justice Branch will deliver on its core responsibilities in a manner that safeguards prosecutorial independence, and supports an -effective justice system through communication, collaborative effort and innovation."==============================================================================JusticeBCJustice and Public Safety Council

"British Columbia’s justice system is being transformed to better meet the needs of citizens. As part of this transformation, the Justice Reform and Transparency Act was passed in 2013. The act created the Justice and Public Safety Council and makes it responsible for setting the strategic direction of the provincial justice system, as well as for holding a regular Justice Summit to consult with major justice participants and stakeholders."

The Council

The Justice and Public Safety Council was established in April 2013, in accordance with the Justice Reform and Transparency Act. The council, which is appointed by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, is responsible for:

• setting the strategic direction and vision for the provincial justice system through an annual Justice and Public Safety Plan;
• engaging in dialogue with justice and public safety participants and stakeholders; and
• guiding the way to open, transparent and accountable leadership.

More detailed information about the council’s responsibilities is set out in section 7 of the Act.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legislation & Policy 

" The Ministry of Justice often consults with British Columbians on legislation and policy. One method is to publish a discussion paper with an invitation to the public to respond. Another means is to use an online survey to solicit input. Public feedback is important because it helps government shape new laws and policies.

The ministry's legislation and policy pages contain information on legislation updates, current online consultations that may lead to future legislation or changes in policy, and an archive of consultations that have recently ended. "

===================================================================================

NOTE: SO! The objective then is to delve in to discovery of any and all materials that could possibly be pertinent to my case. Much online text rendered, bearing fine rhetoric, may not bare ANY weight, when it comes to ARGUING my case!  I must go beyond my Exhibit Case Law proof to find MORE telling 'Cause of Action.' All  must point at the Ministry itself.    I