brazen |ˈbrāzən| adjective1 bold and without shame: he went about his illegal business with a brazen assurance |
monopoly |məˈnäpəlē|
noun (pl. monopolies) - a company or group having exclusive control over a commodity or service:
dysfunctional |ˌdisˈfəNG(k)SH(ə)nl|
adjectivenot operating normally or properly: An emotionally dysfunctional businessman | • deviating from the norms of social behavior in a way regarded as bad: "
TODAY, Tuesday, April 12th is 2 months, to the day, since my Summary 'TRIAL' in Victoria. If you read my transcript in Blog No: 235, you will note my claim was dismissed. There was NO discussing, referring, or viewing any of the particulars; a mere: "Mr. Steen, I've read through your materials. How long do you think you're going to require to put your position before the court?"
It is MY understanding of a Summary Trial, that all of the 'positioning' by the Litigant is laid out in the 'Materials;' that there is little or no talking, or 'Argument ' necessary during the Trial, since all is made clear in the "Materials."
As previously stated, I got the distinct feeling Judge Gaul had NOT read the 'Materials. And in his 'Reasons for Judgment, the Judge's 'Reasons' were primarily based on his erroneous interpretation, forwarded by Mr. Johnny van Camp, Counsel for the AG, I had not filed my papers properly. As you read through the transcript you'll become aware that the Judge has in fact the correct 'black' folder in his possession. A duplicate set was noted - "DELIVERED" to the AG's office. (sent February 4, and delivered Xpress Post the 5th)
Mr. Van Camp is working with a cancelled, NEVER SERVED, November 13th, 2015, set of files, filed at the Registry but adjourned by myself. As he mentions, somehow through 'back doors gotten hold of...
So then what's going on here? Having deviated from set procedures, working through 'back doors,' we are dysfunctional, and the SRL is to blame!
I remind the reader how on February 11th, some ten minutes before I left home on Hornby, the Registry in Victoria called me to ask if I knew the name of the AG's representation Counsel for the trial.
YES! I replied bewildered; an earlier call that day had asked if I was attending the next day?
To my knowledge I had informed the Registry, as one is ordered to, some 5 days before the trial, I would be attending.
I am finding all of it excruciatingly sad! YES, my Lord; NO your HONOUR! BOW your Majesty....To me it's all kids play; a pretend world of deceit, under the guise of 'JUSTICE!'
Don't they have a conscience these men and women? How can they live such demeaning existences? Such lies?
POWER INDEED CORRUPTS! I wonder how many of these 'professionals' could be classified as psychopaths... According to the statistics, quite a few of them!
Shame on us all for allowing it to linger....
It is MY understanding of a Summary Trial, that all of the 'positioning' by the Litigant is laid out in the 'Materials;' that there is little or no talking, or 'Argument ' necessary during the Trial, since all is made clear in the "Materials."
As previously stated, I got the distinct feeling Judge Gaul had NOT read the 'Materials. And in his 'Reasons for Judgment, the Judge's 'Reasons' were primarily based on his erroneous interpretation, forwarded by Mr. Johnny van Camp, Counsel for the AG, I had not filed my papers properly. As you read through the transcript you'll become aware that the Judge has in fact the correct 'black' folder in his possession. A duplicate set was noted - "DELIVERED" to the AG's office. (sent February 4, and delivered Xpress Post the 5th)
Mr. Van Camp is working with a cancelled, NEVER SERVED, November 13th, 2015, set of files, filed at the Registry but adjourned by myself. As he mentions, somehow through 'back doors gotten hold of...
So then what's going on here? Having deviated from set procedures, working through 'back doors,' we are dysfunctional, and the SRL is to blame!
I remind the reader how on February 11th, some ten minutes before I left home on Hornby, the Registry in Victoria called me to ask if I knew the name of the AG's representation Counsel for the trial.
YES! I replied bewildered; an earlier call that day had asked if I was attending the next day?
To my knowledge I had informed the Registry, as one is ordered to, some 5 days before the trial, I would be attending.
I am finding all of it excruciatingly sad! YES, my Lord; NO your HONOUR! BOW your Majesty....To me it's all kids play; a pretend world of deceit, under the guise of 'JUSTICE!'
Don't they have a conscience these men and women? How can they live such demeaning existences? Such lies?
POWER INDEED CORRUPTS! I wonder how many of these 'professionals' could be classified as psychopaths... According to the statistics, quite a few of them!
Shame on us all for allowing it to linger....
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a Comment