17. OPEN LETTER TO THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF CANADA.

To the most honourable Attorneys General of Canada.

Dear Attorneys General:

I am a Canadian Citizen. Having lived an eclectic life, at 74, I reside 'retired' on a basic pension on an Island in the middle of the Salish Sea in British Columbia. Again self-representing, I reach out to your offices thusly, since my jurisdictional discrepancy seems to give me no other direct legal manner.

Unbeknownst matters would come to this, on April 14, 2008 ("or thereabouts," as the legalese implies) I signed an online contract to produce an inter-active, online, Postal/ Zip Code based Classifieds web-site with a large Ottawa domiciled web-developer. With online high-tech speed of change progressing close to the speed of light, Timeline to contract completion was crucial; hence the choice of company for its defined contractual promises. "On the Internet, a little late is too late."(Bill Gates)
It was not to be. The contract was neither honoured, nor ever completed to professional standards.
The window of opportunity came and went.

Some 5 years have past. Although the Rules of Civil Procedure contain a number of jurisdictional applicable rules, a 2010 Small Claims Court Claim filed by this self-representing Claimant in British Columbia was dismissed based on "Lack of Jurisdiction."
An appeal in BC's Supreme Court was abandoned on a technicality. (One may appeal after a Trial, NOT a Hearing.)

The 2011 filing of a claim in the Ottawa Superior Court has today led to an impasse between this Respondent and the Case Management Master's latest order, based on yet another motion demand by Defense. The Respondent can no longer abide by the continued, and Court allowable, requests for case irrelevant Discovery Questions. The Respondent's conscience demands, and hereby requests, the parties and the Superior Court adhere to the Rules as clearly defined by the Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case has already taken up far too much Court time and is beyond ready for - TRIAL!

Your Ministry appoints its Officers - Masters and Judges alike - to uphold the Rules in accordance with their sworn oaths, and with fair, unbiased consideration to all Canadian Citizens. As such it is your Ministry's duty to keep their expressions as well as the Democratic windows for a Citizen's hearing in check - at all times. As such, "in the circumstances" why is it this Self-Representing Counsel as an honourable Citizen may not directly correspond with the Court's Offices? Why is it that Pro-Bono aid is limited to family law, immigration and criminal law?

In closing, the Respondent acknowledges the online statement your Ministry of Justice is "the only  Canadian Ministry which has not been re-organized since its creation in 1867." The Respondent herewith humbly suggests your Ministry join us by entering the 21st Century, then acknowledge the e-commerce, high tech world of business in which Jurisdictional boundaries have globalized, and as such obliterated. As it stands, this Canadian Citizen feels he is caught in the middle of an Alice in Wonderland type Justice in which oath-bound Justicial Brothers and Sisters manage to play subjective havoc by willy nilly setting the Rules on their end. What has happened to due process?

Does your Ministry have a meaningful directive to my pleas?