Tuesday 6 September 2016

261. Under the GUISE of JUSTICE lurks the RHETORIC of insidious EVIL !

VIEWS@16808

LONG LIVE HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN......whichever one is reigning over the British Empire....(YIP US!)
"Whoa Canada, our Chrome and Naive Land!" 
From the Supreme Court Act!

"Powers and privileges

3  (1) The Chief Justice, Associate Chief Justice and judges have all the powers, rights, incidents, privileges and immunities of a judge of a superior court of record, and all other powers, rights, incidents, privileges and immunities that on March 29, 1870, were vested in the Chief Justice and the other justices of the court."
====================================================================

There it is! There are no longer any surprises left. There is to be only ONE WINNER, and all goes back to 1870! Now we know! The Law as set in 1870; imagine it? Nothing has changed since 1870! Such lunacy?! And it continues to reign still; raining all over us poor subject peasants...

It appears the more you poke away at a staid system the more it eventually shows its essence of origin.  So I Googled: '1870 England'!  For those of you interested - have a read...
Copied from Wikipedia" (last Para=pertinent) "immunity of jurisdiction" was borne right there!

"Civil service

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Alternative civilian servicethe album, or Public service.
The term civil service can refer to either a branch of governmental service in which individuals are employed (hired) on the basis of professional merit as proven by competitive examinations; or the body of employees in any government agency apart from the military, which is a separate extension of any national government.
civil servant or public servant is a person in the public sector employed for a government department or agency. The extent of civil servants of a state as part of the "civil service" varies from country to country. In the United Kingdom, for instance, only Crown (national government) employees are referred to as civil servants whereas county or city employees are not.
Many consider the study of service to be a part of the field of public administration. Workers in "non-departmental public bodies" (sometimes called "QUANGOs") may also be classed as civil servants for the purpose of statistics and possibly for their terms and conditions. Collectively a state's civil servants form its civil service or public service.
An international civil servant or international staff member is a civilian employee who is employed by an intergovernmental organization. These international civil servants do not resort under any national legislation (from which they have immunity of jurisdiction) but are governed by internal staff regulations. All disputes related to international civil service are brought before special tribunals created by these international organizations such as, for instance, the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO. "
===================================================================================
Some 'other' events that occurred in only 'yesterday's 1870 
(in our then Queen Victoria's glorious England).
* I then wondered when Women were first allowed to Vote
"Political movement towards women's suffrage began during the war and in 1918, the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed an act granting the vote to: women over the age of 30 who were householders, the wives of householders, occupiers of property with an annual rent of £5, and graduates of British universities."

* But please make note: Not just ANY woman was allowed to Vote! You had to be at least the wife of a householder; Who knows, maybe a Judge's wife was guaranteed allowances, NO questions asked...?
============================================================================
  • Back to 2016! With Internet and all the world at our fingertips, global this and global that, but better remember, 'Justice' is ANCIENT! And you, Mr. Quixote, better get it, and if and when you finally do.... get lost! You've been taking up our valuable time. You have been 'abusing the process of our courts,' while contributing NOTHING !  (They used below: 9-5 (1) (a) + {d) to shut me down.) 
    Rule 9-5 — Striking Pleadings

    Scandalous, frivolous or vexatious matters

    (1)At any stage of a proceeding, the court may order to be struck out or amended the whole or any part of a pleading, petition or other document on the ground that
    (a) it discloses no reasonable claim or defence, as the case may be,
    (b) it is unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious,
    (c) it may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial or hearing of the proceeding, or
    (d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court,
    and the court may pronounce judgment or order the proceeding to be stayed or dismissed and may order the costs of the application to be paid as special costs.
    ===============================================================================


    Like Kings and Queens, the Laws for the Haloed Creme-de-la Creme Lords and Ladies, Un-accountable, Un-abashed, Un-touchable Upper Class continue to reign over us. 

    I repeat: No wonder this world is in chaos! Shame to the lot of us for these allowances.
Rule 9-3 — Special Case

Statement of special case

(1)The parties to a proceeding may concur in stating a question of law or fact, or partly of law and partly of fact, in the form of a special case for the opinion of the court.

Court may order special case

(2)The court may order a question or issue arising in a proceeding, whether of fact or law or partly of fact and partly of law, and whether raised by the pleadings or otherwise, to be stated in the form of a special case.

Form of special case

(3)A special case must
(a) be divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively,
(b) state concisely such facts and set out or refer to such documents as may be necessary to enable the court to decide the questions stated, and
(c) be signed by the parties or their lawyers.

Hearing of special case

(4)On the hearing of a special case, the court and the parties may refer to any document mentioned in the special case, and the court may draw from the stated facts and documents any inference, whether of fact or law, that might have been drawn from them if proved at a trial or hearing.

Order after hearing of special case

(5)With the consent of the parties, on any question in a special case being answered, the court may grant specific relief or order judgment to be entered.
I will continue my swan-song tomorrow...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post a Comment