Wednesday 12 June 2013

10. JUDICIAL REVIEW..... UNFOLDING ....


 File No: 10-49776

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT
(OTTAWA)

BETWEEN:

EVERT JAN STEEN
Applicant
-and-

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AS REPRESENTED BY THE
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF ONTARIO AND
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO and
THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA
Respondents

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

TO THE RESPONDENTS

A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED by the applicant. The claim made by the applicant appears on the following page.

THIS APPLICATION for a judicial review will come on for a hearing before the Superior Court on a Date at a place to be fixed by the Registrar of the Superior Court of Ontario. The applicant requests this application be heard at the Courtenay Court Registry, 420 Cumberland Road, Courtenay, BC, V9N 2C4. Should that consideration not be legally allowable, then, alternatively, at whatever Place of Conduct the Attorney General's Office of Ontario stipulates. 

IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must forthwith prepare a notice of appearance in Form 38C prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing. 
(This British Columbia based Applicant assumes Jurisdictional disparity will be considered, in case the hearing resides at an Attorney General decided Ontario location )  

IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE COURT OR TO EXAMINE OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESS ON THE APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must, in addition to serving your notice of appearance, serve a copy of the evidence on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in the office of the Superior Court within thirty days after service on you of the applicant's application record, or not later than 2 p.m. on the day before the hearing, whichever is earlier. 

______________________________________________________________________________

The above, best I interpret it, is Page 2 (Page 1 being a horizontal cover of parties, and addresses)
I continue to have more and more concerned friends, and assorted caring, calling me a fool to think actual JUSTICE may yet be achieved. But I need to see this to its logistic end - win or loose. From that perspective, both parties have already lost - and BADLY! Ironies abound to think Defense has spent some $100,000 to date. Had I had it, my backers would have been paid back, and all would have gone to sleep! 

BUT, in order to write my Case History, I just CAN'T let go yet. Every step is still new, and as such, I can't yet quit.  

A comment from SOMEONE, HATE or condone, would be much appreciated. 





No comments:

Post a Comment

Post a Comment